The internet is buzzing with opinions on Kate Hudson’s boobs, with a supermodel saying she’s praying over them while Spencer Pratt believes they’re still too small. The question is, are they really fake or is Kate pregnant? An investigation that includes photographic evidence and celebrity witness testimony is shedding some light on the matter. Last week, Us Weekly reported that Kate had gotten a boob job, bringing her chest from a flat A or B cup to a modest but fuller size. This news came as a surprise since Kate had always been proud of being flat-chested and even boasted about how she could wear plunging necklines elegantly. However, recent appearances at Coachella confirmed that her chest is now larger than usual. While Kate hasn’t confirmed or denied the rumors, the breasts look different from uniformly spherical bubble-boobs associated with plastic surgery. They also appear to be ever-so-slightly further apart than usual, leading to speculation about whether the change is due to minor weight gain.
During my college summer job at Marshall Fields in the lingerie department, I gained knowledge of a technical term called “wide-set breasts,” which I find unappealing and impolite considering the fact that Kate’s breasts look amazing. They look natural and wonderful just the way they are, and that’s what matters most. Recently, I noticed that Kate had a larger-than-usual belly during an outing, which made me wonder if she’s pregnant. However, Gossip Cop claims that it’s not true, but Kate’s publicist is yet to confirm or deny the rumor.
Could it be possible for Kate to have a chest like this naturally? After conducting a historical analysis of her fluctuating breast size, it appears that they have been both flatter and larger in the past. The low-cut dress Kate wore at the premiere of
was in the year of her son’s birth, indicating that it was likely temporary. However, if she is pregnant again, the question arises as to who the father could be.